Backgrounder on Measuring Sustainability

Why measure sustainability?

We need relatively easy ways of assessing progress toward sustainability. Over the past half-century, we have been developing systems to measure changes in such fields as economics, social issues, quality of life, environment and natural resources, and health.

They all rely on indicators, which are simply tools for condensing large amounts of information into a format that can be more easily understood. Indicators help us to see issues in a snapshot format. Where trend data is available, they let us track changes over time.

Indicators are useful in a series of steps in understanding and dealing with issues.

  • They can help to identify, define and communicate about issues, setting the scene for action.
  • They can be used to forecast the results of policy choices.
  • When the policies are implemented, indicators are needed to keep track of results, and report on progress. Results can be measured against targets.
  • When policies are being evaluated, indicators report on performance, and the results need to be fed back into the policy process so adjustments can be made.

Once indicators have been adopted, they will guide the collection of data and information, and information policies in general, by helping to identify priority issues.

Evolution of sustainability measuring systems

Sustainability is about the ability of people and the environment to be able to continue to function in a healthy manner indefinitely. Choices for sustainability depend very much of the values of people and societies, which have much in common around the world, but are often expressed in different ways.

Designing sustainability measuring systems means understanding the values, goals and aspirations of audiences. It means giving people useful feedback on issues they know, and informing them about issues that are important but poorly understood, such as the importance of ecosystem health for human health and well being.

Sustainability measuring systems must face the challenge of capturing not only the details but also the interactions among social, economic, institutional and environmental factors. The most difficult job is to aggregate different types of information, with different measuring systems, into a coherent and balanced message.

The roots of sustainability reporting are largely in State of the Environment reporting, which has been evolving as a discipline since the 1980s. Environmental reporting systems have evolved frameworks, incorporating such factors as the Driving Forces, Pressure, State, Impact and Response. Such reporting approaches show how pressures, such as consumption of natural resources and releases of pollutants, change the state of the environment and have impacts on ecosystems and humans, leading to responses, such as policy changes or shifts in consumption patterns that attempt to reduce the pressures and mitigate impacts.

A number of reporting specialists are working on integrated sets of measures that include ecological, economic and social factors in one package. The goal is to show the interconnections among what are now seen as separate sectors.

Elements of sustainability measuring systems

  • Grounded in values of the audiences.
  • Requires a broad perspective.
  • Measures interactions between human activities and environmental changes.
  • Provides messages that enable people to understand interconnections and to make informed choices.

Attempts to measure sustainability

As sustainability reporting slowly evolves as a discipline, various groups have produced their own approaches and measuring systems.

Genuine Progress Indicator
The Genuine Progress Indicator tries to build from Gross Domestic Product, expanding the set of measures to include the economic contributions of the family and community to the society and to measure the contribution of the environment to human well-being. It seeks to present all this in monetary terms.

Ecological footprint
The footprint concept helps to communicate estimates of the human demands on the environment by calculating the impacts of certain forms of consumption and pollution. Although not a precise measurement, it provides a very effective snapshot and allows comparisons among regions.

Barometer of sustainability
This approach uses a graph to show how well a given society is doing in achieving sustainability. It does this by plotting various countries in terms of human and ecosystem well-being and seeing where the two lines meet.

The Dashboard of Sustainability
A cluster of indicators is presented visually in a form resembling a dashboard with the goal of letting people see measures of the status of the environment, the economy, and the social well-being of a nation at a glance.

[For more information see Other Measuring Systems.]

Sources of information on indicators

The National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy is developing Canada’s first national set of sustainability indicators for the federal government. Their Environment and Sustainable Development Indicators Initiative has its own web page.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development, a Winnipeg-based centre of expertise in sustainability issues, is an excellent source on sustainability reporting. They have the Measurement and Indicators for Sustainable Development program that that includes a wide set of examples of reporting in their Compendium of SD Indicator Initiatives. IISD is also a source for the Bellagio Principles which lay out guidelines for the whole of the sustainability assessment process including the choice and design of indicators, their interpretation and communication.

Other sources of information on reporting, include:

The Global Reporting Initiative, an international project to create a common framework for voluntary reporting of economic, environmental and social impacts.

The OECD, which has been developing an environmental indicators program.

The Sustainable Measures program, a program run by an independent expert on sustainability.

The IUCN Monitoring and Evaluation Initiative


Note: This paper drew from many sources, including writings by: Marion Cheatle, Senior Environmental Affairs Officer Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme, and Tony Hodge, a consultant and expert in measuring sustainability, from Victoria, BC. It also drew from two publications by the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy: the 1993 paper, Toward Reporting Progress on Sustainable Development in Canada, and the 1995 book, Pathways to Sustainability: Assessing Our Progress

TOP

Home

Measuring Sustainability

Indicators for Canada

ESDI timeline

ESDI web site


Background | Sustainability Issues | Options & Ideas | Sustainable Business
Indicators | National Reporting Survey | News & Views | Resources

Copyright © 2002. Sustainability Reporting Program. All rights reserved.